The Dichotomy of AI Art: A 50/50 Reception (orginally published August 2023)

 The reception of AI-generated art has polarized both the art world and the general public. On one side of the debate, traditionalists argue that genuine artistry is rooted in the human touch, requiring years of dedication, emotion, and nuance that machines inherently lack. This perspective holds that the essence of art is in the imperfections and personal expressions of the creator, elements that artificial intelligence cannot replicate. Critics of AI art often see it as a sterile and mechanical imitation, devoid of the soul that characterizes human creativity.

Conversely, proponents of AI art celebrate it as an innovative and exciting medium that challenges the conventional boundaries of creativity. They argue that AI can generate unique and complex works that push the limits of what is possible, blending technology with artistry in ways that were previously unimaginable. Supporters highlight that AI can serve as a tool for artists, enhancing their creative process rather than replacing it. By leveraging algorithms and computational power, artists can explore new forms and styles, creating pieces that are both novel and inspiring.

As a small moving tribute that include the very difficult flaws what do you see in context of time based on The Theme Albert's Through Time?

A draft that has simply found a medium to be seen as a small part of a much bigger collection of The Book of Albert by Dezeeartee.